Archæology

The assorted finds of Artefact Publishing

Search engine optimisation

I was in a meeting recently at which the phrase “search engine optimisation” was used, prompting a (mercifully brief) discussion of useful techniques. I restrained myself from simply saying, “write decent content and don’t let anything get in its way”. However, I did think it, and of how entries on this blog are highly ranked in Google for such queries as “wellington bypass” (or just “bypass” on New Zealand pages), “adapting book to film”, “IQ statistics average”, “postgresql sequences”, and “New Zealand immigration language” (quotation marks were not used in the searches). This despite no optimisation, no overloading of key terms, and no one actually linking to those pages (a major factor in Google’s page ranking algorithm).

What does this tell me? Mostly, I think, that I do not understand what people do to make their web pages not be ranked higher — it’s not like I’ve gone on and on about any of the above topics. Alright, maybe one of them, but then I also have a PDF which is the top result for “gemealt”, one of the words in Beowulf. I mean, really, where are the academics?

Posted by jamie on March 30, 2004 21:48+12:00

Comments

At one stage I was ranked number 1 for 'sedatives' in searchnz. I would have thought that at least one of the pharmacy sites would be trying to be found for that. (Just checked: still true.)

Posted by: iona on March 30, 2004 22:45+12:00

I have heard it suggested that blogs rate unduly highly in Google, simply because other incoming links from people's blogrolls give you a high pagerank. So I would be cautious in asserting that your pristine markup and gorgeous prose style are wholly responsible. Lovely though they are, of course.

Posted by: stephen on March 31, 2004 11:45+12:00

Stephen, that would be a better argument if I was linked to by lots of people. However, the pages in question are the archives of my blog which I don’t believe anyone links to, and the number of people linking to my main page are counted in the ones.

That said, I don’t think it’s my gorgeous prose style either.

Posted by: Jamie on March 31, 2004 17:01+12:00

I'm not so sure Jamie. I link to you, and i get at leaast 5 vistors a week which is a lot of people.

Posted by: sue on April 5, 2004 00:47+12:00